Building overmatch in critical infrastructure

Critical security in infrastructure must be seen as more than a protection against the basic estimations of unknowns and vacant probability tables. Taking lessons learned from national defense for application to homeland security.

Design Basis Threat: A high risk game of uncertainty.

Can the broad estimation of design basis threat (DBT) compete against the mathematical precision of cumulative distribution function (CDF)? Critical infrastructure must explore new methods for resilience.

Russian attack vectors for U.S. critical infrastructure.

The Pentagon is not the only one whose attention is required for understanding Russian interference. The activation of disenfranchised people groups via underhanded Russian campaigns are crafted against U.S. critical infrastructure.

Chinese intent and attack vectors against C.I.

Chinese methodology in hegemonic behavioral patterns reveal intent against the west. Using social media, four specific personas were targeted to create divisions in Taiwan. Lessons learned for protecting American critical assets.

The CSRAC research center was founded to serve the security interests of critical infrastructure organizations. Whether malevolent acts are perpetrated by foreign states, domestic extremists, or lone actors, security must be resolute to withstand attacks from all vectors.

CSRAC provides research to highlight emerging threat impacts on key infrastructure, and how to scale appropriate and cost effective solutions in new methodologies.

Multi-vector Attacks on Critical Infrastructure: Evaluating combination attacks and resiliency
(Pending publication)

Chasing Threats:  injurious thinking to critical security.
 

Physical Security Resiliency in One Water: Protecting the tender underbelly of clean water supply.